July 13th, 2010
Filed under: Law
Jillian Nichols, spent two months in Malawi, Africa, on work placement
Jillian Nichols, who is completing her third year at Robson Hall, has just returned from spending nearly two months in Malawi, a tiny country in the warm heart of Africa, on a service learning experience called Ntchito Yabwino (meaning “good work” in Chichewa). The program was a joint effort between the University of Manitoba’s International Centre for Students (ICS) and Canadian Physicians for Aid and Relief (CPAR), a non-governmental organization. Together with two other U of M students, she embarked on a two week study tour led by Tony Rogge, Director of ICS, followed by a four week placement with CPAR, where they facilitated a communications training program with staff in the northern and central offices.
While the placement wasn’t related to law in the strict sense, Jillian says she was able to understand the laws that facilitate and constrain international development through attending meetings with different members of government, law enforcement and the judiciary. She had the opportunity to see the role that law plays in development, from the implementation of projects to awareness and access among community members. Jillian reports that from a human rights perspective, “it was an interesting time to be in Malawi as a same sex couple was sentenced to 14 years in prison with hard labour, and subsequently pardoned following international condemnation and a visit from UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon”.
Jillian strongly encourages other students interested in international law and development to visit ICS and consider a similar placement in the future. In her experience, “it was refreshing and enlightening to see the law from a different perspective”.
While in Malawi, the U of M students kept a blog to document their experiences. It can be found at: www.ontheroadinmalawi.wordpress.com
Posted in: Law
July 13th, 2010
Filed under: Law
2010 Law graduate Derrick Stewart
2010 LL.B. graduate Derrick Stewart was invited in May to present his research paper on the controversial topic of Athletic Enhancements at conference in New York on Bioethics. Not yet a law graduate Derrick recalls, “it was completely intimidating. Probably 90% of the attendees held a Ph.D., M.D. or Masters degree. I, on the other hand, had only my Bachelor of Science on my name tag since I haven’t even received my LL.B. yet.”
The conference: Disability, and Ethics, through the Life Cycle: Cases, Controversies, & Finding Common Ground was presented by Albany Law School, Rapaport Ethics Across the Curriculum Initiative of Union College, & the Union Graduate College-Mount Sinai School of Medicine Bioethics Program, and was endorsed by the American Society of Bioethics and Humanities. Attending the two day conference consisting of panel presentations was according to Derrick, “well worth my time, and really piqued my interest in the area of Bioethics. I met many influential people including Dr. Mark Kuczewski of Loyola University in Chicago, President of the American Society for Bioethics & Humanities and Robert Baker, Chair of the Bioethics Program at Union College and Union Graduate School.”
In pursuit of his post-secondary education Derrick thought he would become an M.D. Once he obtained his Bachelor of Science degree, he discovered that he didn’t have the dedication or interest that would be required to complete medical school. However, he still had an interest in medicine and it became clear that a career in Law school was a viable option when he saw that the Faculty of Law offered a class on Law and Bioethics. Derrick states, “When I saw the course offered I thought it was a great way to bring that interest into my legal education.”
Professor Mary Shariff, taught the Law and Bioethics course in the Fall 2009 term and introduced Derrick to the cutting-edge topic of Athletic Enhancements and Sports Law. Through her mentoring and feedback Derrick produced a fine paper focusing on prosthetics. The paper uses Oscar Pistorius, a double amputee runner, as a case study for the implications, both legal and moral, of the exclusion of disabled athletes from able-bodied competitions. In 2008, he strived to qualify to compete in the able-bodied Beijing Olympics in 2008 but the International Amateur Athletics Federation passed a ruling preventing the use of prosthetics in able-bodied competition, effectively disqualifying him.
Derrick explains, “My general thesis is that while prosthetics do not currently offer disabled athletes a net advantage, it is likely that in the near future, as technology progress, they will offer an advantage which we have to be prepared to handle. Furthermore, given our cultural emphasis on sports and the prestige of competing in the Olympics we are likely to see more challenges of this type. I argue that, in order to handle the likely coming deluge, we must come up with a method of assessing prosthetics, and the individuals using them (since no prosthetic or athlete is the same), in a way that is fair and transparent. I also looked at Canadian, United Nations, American and U.K. legislation in the area and argue that if the governing bodies of sport do not find some method on their own, we could see an immense number of challenges at the next Olympics in London in 2012 (the U.K. has very strong disability legislation which has a reverse discrimination requirement in some employment cases which I argue could be extended to athletic competitions)”
Prof. Shariff suggested that Derrick submit his abstract after she came across a call for papers for the Conference. When asked more about the Bioethics and the Law course Professor Shariff says, “I take an intensive approach to teaching the course and, encourage students to consider developing and writing their papers with a view to publication right from the outset. I spend time in the first class discussing publication possibilities with students and continue to provide assistance and suggestions to those students who are interested or just curious. I believe that our students have a lot of talent and that as a Professor I should be doing my best to nurture, mentor and promote quality research and writing in our students. I see the relationship with 2nd and 3rd year law students as a partnership.”
Derrick Stewart is currently articling at Roy, Johnston & Co. in Brandon. He hopes to remain there, and in addition to practice, pursue teaching at the University and continue writing and publishing.
Posted in: Law
July 13th, 2010
Filed under: Law
Chris Hunt, 2006 Law Graduate
No Objections to His Success
Hunt also received the Cambridge International Scholarship, an award given to the incoming doctoral candidate ranked highest by the Cambridge Faculty of Law.
Hunt studied law at the University of Manitoba’s Robson Hall where he received numerous prizes and awards for his academic abilities. After a clerkship with the Supreme Court of British Columbia, he received awards from the Law Society of British Columbia and the Cambridge Commonwealth Trust to entice him to complete his studies at Cambridge.
“I think my time at Robson Hall prepared me well both for serving as a law clerk and for my current PhD research,” Hunt says.
“I recall flying to Vancouver during my second year of law school for the clerkship interview and feeling intimidated as I was virtually the only candidate not from UBC or UVic. I was interviewed by a panel of six justices. I got the sense that being from Winnipeg made my application stand out. Two of these justices were also very impressed by the large number of black-letter, doctrinal courses I had taken. Having a broad mandatory curriculum is a real strength of Robson Hall. It attracted me to Robson Hall initially and has benefited me while clerking, practising at the firm and now during my research.”
His research interests lie in the area of privacy, tort and contract law and, in the fall of 2010, Hunt has agreed to teach a course on contract law at Cambridge University. When he completes his PhD in 2012 he intends to enter academia.
“It is not in the least surprising to see Chris earn this honour,” says Lorna Turnbull, acting dean of the Faculty of Law. “He was an excellent student while he was at Robson Hall. He was on the Dean’s Honour List twice and was named a Pitblado scholar, but more importantly he demonstrated an intellectual curiosity and engagement that presaged his exceptional performance at Cambridge.”
Chris Hunt, a 2006 graduate from the University of Manitoba’s Faculty of Law, is the recipient of the most prestigious doctoral awarded offered by Cambridge University in the United Kingdom. Tenable for the duration of his doctoral studies in law, the W.M. Tapp Fellowship is the largest award offered by Cambridge.
Posted in: Law
July 13th, 2010
Filed under: Law
By Bryan Smith | Publication Date: June 28, 2010
Manitoba law
For four days this month, people in Winnipeg came together to learn about a dark period in Canadian history.
Almost 150 years after the residential school system was implemented in Canada, the negative effects it had on the country’s aboriginal population are still being felt today. With the formation of the truth and reconciliation commission, officials are making efforts to find out what took place in the residential schools. Part of the commission’s five-year plan is a series of national events held in different regions across Canada. The first event took place in Winnipeg from June 16-19.
As part of the event, the law school at the University of Manitoba was represented by 25 volunteer students at a question-and-answer session. Organized by Karen Busby, a law professor at the university, and Dayna Steinfeld, a second-year student and research assistant, the volunteers were on hand for the duration of the event to provide legal information and help to anyone who wanted to learn more about aboriginal law.
“I was approached by the truth and reconciliation commission, and said that they were going to have a learning panel,” says Busby.
“They asked if we wanted to participate, and we felt that a Q&A table was a good way to provide information. We also put together a brochure and a video series that go into further detail about aboriginal law.”
According to Steinfeld, there was no problem when it came to finding volunteers as students at the law school were quick to sign up to support a worthy cause.
“We had tons of responses from students, and it was great to see that so many of them were willing to volunteer on their own time,” says Steinfeld.
With the commission hoping the event would raise awareness and begin the long road towards healing for Canada’s aboriginal population, making legal information accessible is important, she notes. “We really believe that in order for reconciliation to occur, all Canadians, aboriginal and non-aboriginal, need to have a foundation of knowledge. Everyone needs to be aware of the basic questions about aboriginal constitutional law. For example, what is a treaty? A lot of people don’t know, or don’t understand, and that can create conflict in general Canadian society.”
While the Q&A table was aimed at those attending the event, it was also a source of education and experience for the student volunteers. Aboriginal constitutional law is compulsory in the first year of study at the law school, and in later years, it’s further integrated into the curriculum through classes and seminars. Students who volunteered were not only given the opportunity to apply what they had learned, they were also presented with basic aboriginal legal issues in a non-classroom setting.
“I encouraged the students to ask the survivors, ‘Where are you from?’” says Busby. “Once they started talking about their home communities, they would engage in longer discussions. It was simply an amazing encounter between young law students and survivors coming to a better understanding of each other.”
Steinfeld agrees the event was a unique opportunity for knowledge to be shared.
“We had some really good questions presented to us, questions that were quite varied,” she says. “We had people asking us about how aboriginal law fits into the Canadian legal structure. We were asked about how treaties are negotiated and whether or not they can be renegotiated. Several non-aboriginal Canadians asked us about the compensation that is available to survivors, which was good to see. And we were also asked questions about ourselves — where we’re from, why we were there. The survivors were really excited to know about the group of law students, and it was an excellent topic of conversation.”
The national event in Winnipeg was the first of seven that are to be held across Canada over the next four years. Given the Q&A table’s success, Busby hopes other law schools will follow the University of Manitoba’s example.
“It was fun to organize; the students were very excited to do it; and it’s a great cause,” she says. “I would highly recommend being a part of it. It was a lot of fun and also deeply satisfying for all involved.”
Click here to read the University of Manitoba Faculty of Law’s fact sheet about aboriginal law in Canada.
Posted in: Law
July 13th, 2010
Filed under: Law
Class of 2010 Law Graduates
The Susan Loadman Memorial Award was presented to Heather Belle Guest by Jonathan Lloyd, Susan Loadman’s son. Jonathan came from Toronto to present the award. This is presented to a student who has demonstrated determination and perseverance in progressing in his or her law studies despite significant obstacles to such progress.
Class valedictorian Derek Davidson addressed the crowd of 350 and reminded the class of 2010 of the excellent legal education they have received at Robson Hall. He inspired the class to have pride and to value their law degree.
Dr. Lorna Turnbull, Acting Dean, gave an inspirational speech which was followed by a toast to the graduates, which was well received.
“You have been a stellar group of students and I know you will leave Robson Hall and continue to impress all around you with your dedication to justice and the highest standards of professionalism.” Acting Dean Lorna Turnbull
The official Annual Spring Convocation Ceremony at the University followed at 3:00 pm for the conferring of Degrees and the awarding of Academic Honours.
The Ceremony was truly a celebration of excellence and a memorable day for the Faculty of Law. This year, two Robson Hall Alumni, were honoured for their achievements. Mr. Harvey L. Secter, former Dean of the Law School, was installed as Chancellor of the University of Manitoba and honoured as Dean Emeritus. Mr. Justice Rothstein, a respected lawyer, jurist and member of Canada’s highest court, was presented with a Honourary Doctor of Laws degree. One could easily see that Mr. Harvey Secter was delighted to have the opportunity to confer the honorary doctorate to long-time friend and colleague Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein. In addition, this year’s University Gold Medal for highest academic standing was awarded to Anne Amos-Stewart.
Further Celebrations continued in the evening a small reception honouring our new Chancellor and Dean Emeritus, and Mr. Justice Rothstein’s honourary doctorate. The reception was attended by both honourees and by members of the judiciary and profession.
By every account the day’s events were a huge success.
Posted in: Law
July 13th, 2010
Filed under: Law
By Mariianne Mays Wiebe | Publication Date: April 12, 2010
Three University of Manitoba students recently told their personal stories about accessibility and the Faculty of Law.
Three University of Manitoba students recently told their personal stories about accessibility and the Faculty of Law.
Before he came to Robson Hall, Philippe Richer, originally from Montreal and now 42, had long-term careers in the military and in sales. After his marriage fell apart in 2005, he was faced with the prospect of starting over. He consulted a psychologist for an aptitude test and found he had capacities for law and architecture. He started to look into financing a return to school, and after a year in arts, applied to both architecture and law at the University of Manitoba. He was accepted by both.
Research and his gut told him that, for him, law was the way to go. But it was an expensive proposition. Previously he had worked part-time to offset his expenses while studying, and he thought he’d be able to do the same while attending law school. He soon found out that the expectations of law studies exceeded his available time. With joint custody of his children and school expenses, Richer realized he would have to seek funding in addition to his $13,000 student loan.
When he went to see Lorna Turnbull, now acting dean of the Faculty of Law, about his problem, he discovered he was eligible for a bursary. He had assumed he wouldn’t qualify.
Eventually the bursary and loan worked out for Richer, and now it all seems worth it. Upon graduation in June 2010, he aims to practise criminal law, in part because he enjoys the performative aspect of it — a residue from his days in theatre class. He also relishes the problem-solving aspects of law.
“Many people think of the law as concrete and delineated,” said Richer. “One of the first things I learned, going to law school, is that it’s ambiguous. There’s a range of possibilities outside of each rule that makes you ask, ‘how far does the law extend [in this instance]?’ Rarely are things so clear.”
Jennifer Guiboche
Jennifer Guiboche was in a different kind of situation. Guiboche, who is aboriginal and will graduate this year at the tender age of 23, is among the youngest students ever to enter the Faculty of Law at the U of M. The course she took at her high school in Swan River introduced her to the law, and she couldn’t stop reading the assigned text. She loved it.
After completing two years of university at the undergraduate level, including a year in psychology, Guiboche decided that she wanted to try to skip the undergrad degree and enter the faculty directly. She felt she couldn’t afford to wait the extra year.
She made it in and was granted an entrance scholarship and multiple bursaries. Guiboche also benefited from the University of Manitoba’s ACCESS program, which alleviated some of her financial stress. Without their help, she says, she would not likely be where she is today.
“They assisted me with all my student loan dealings and financially contributed to my university education over the years, including my years in law school,” she said.
She has since excelled — but in the beginning she felt somewhat intimidated by the formal atmosphere and by her relatively older colleagues.
Faculty of Law graduate Shelley Overwater believes that these types of accessibility issues are just as significant as financial ones.
Though her philosophy is that people who really want something will find a way to achieve it, Overwater believes that with individual student circumstances shifting due to increased access to education, the faculty could do more to ease the transition of non-Winnipeg students or students to whom a world of privilege and education is unfamiliar.
A mature student from a Northern community when she entered law, Overwater was a single parent and a self-described career waitress at bars and restaurants. She was also a recovering alcoholic. While in treatment for her addiction, she decided that she wanted to help others the way she had been helped. A foray into social work through the Northern Access program, however, wasn’t a happy one. She didn’t care for the system, she said. Looking for another option, Overwater tried her shot at the LSAT and scored respectably.
Overwater recognizes that Faculty of Law fees are less than at places such as Osgoode Hall Law School, and her early offer from the U of M faculty included an entrance scholarship, but it wasn’t enough. Eventually she found work at the law library but she was “still scraping.”
She faced other pressures she didn’t anticipate. “Many undergrads [coming into the law program] are used to the networking and other expectations within the program. But as a former waitress, the only dressy clothes I had in my closet were black and white clothing and beat-up shoes.
“There were events I had to miss because of financial stressors like that.”
Overwater saw the strain on many of her colleagues too. “Law school is very competitive and I know that [all of these stresses] come with what you sign up for, but if they want to make education accessible to a broader segment of the population, then they need to be aware that there could be other problems.”
“Some of these things for me as an older student weren’t a big deal, but I see the pressure for the younger ones,” she said.
Overwater now works in Morden, where the slower pace and variety that comes with being part of a smaller firm in a small town suits her. She and her partner “absolutely love it. There’s tons of work [in rural areas], no parking to pay for, lower housing costs and the people are great.”
She said she succeeded thanks to the kindness and help she received from several Faculty of Law profs, the U of M Student Advocacy Centre and Disability Services (she also suffers from a mental health disability). However, she also feels that the program would benefit from a greater emphasis on orientation for new students to the culture, and awareness-education for those who teach in the faculty.
“There is tremendous pressure to score the right job,” said Overwater. “And with that kind of pressure, people can be afraid to say what they think.”
Overwater says access is about more than just giving money to people. She is quick to acknowledge, however, that greater access has meant an improvement, and she loves the practice of law. “I think they are doing a lot to make it more accessible.”
“And when I got my diploma, I was just thrilled.”
This article originally appeared in The Bulletin from the University of Manitoba. It has been reprinted with permission.
Posted in: Law
July 13th, 2010
Filed under: Law
For the past ten years Robson Hall has required first-year students in their Legal System course to “Judge Shadow” at the downtown Law Courts.
No, this is not about stalking but about observing and learning.
The students form groups of four to spend Mondays in the winter semester with a Provincial Court judge and a Court of Queen’s Bench justice. They shadow them in chambers, in court and even over lunch.
Often the judge simply asks them: “Well, what should I do in this case?”
The program is unique to Canadian law schools and is directed by Professor DeLloyd Guth. Helping to coordinate the program can be a logistical nightmare, matching court and judge times with student course calendars. The job of coordination falls to Aimée Fortier, Executive Assistant to the Chief Justices and the Chief Judge. Without her inside help the Program would flounder.
This program is all part of a strategic attempt to merge the worlds of doctrine and practice within their crucial third element: legal-judicial history.
The Legal System course invites students to see the present system operating in the context of the institutions, procedures, personnel and vocabulary of our common law and equity traditions. The focus is on how ancient forms of action have developed into observable courtroom business, whether for civil actions, such as in contract and tort, or for indictable and summary criminal pleadings.
Student evaluations are virtually unanimous in concluding that Judge Shadowing is “…the best part of the first year.”
Why?
“It brings together everything we are learning,” according to one participant.
When finished, each student writes an essay analyzing the roles that evidence, authorities and argument played in the cases visited, the lawyers observed and the judges shadowed.
As one student recently noted: “That’s a real mind-blower… But it made me think quickly about how to apply what my Robson Hall courses may and may not contain.”
The judges involved often shepherd students inside bail and youth remand proceedings.
They also report special pleasure with the mentoring opportunities Judge Shadowing offers, even when the student response is occasionally way off base.
That’s part of the learning process too!
Posted in: Law
July 13th, 2010
Filed under: Law
First year student Katrina Broughton is off to Bangladesh in May, learning about international development work. She then goes on to Togo for July and August, taking part in a human rights legal internship with the Human Rights Commission. The aim of the program is to help ordinary Togolese people understand their rights and what protection they’re legally entitled to in various situations.
Katrina is the first law student to be accepted into the “Bangladesh Service Learning Experience,” a program administered by University of Manitoba Office of Student Life. This is a real feather in Katrina’s cap because the program receives numerous of applications each year and only five students from across campus are selected.
“I have a keen desire to learn more about the international community and relate it to what I am currently learning in law school,” she says. “I am interested in eventually pursuing a career in international law and human rights and at present am also actively involved in the local community.”
Recently she founded a student chapter of Canadian Lawyers Abroad, a Canadian-based organization that organizes law internships for students. As a result, Robson Hall students will be able to apply for a dedicated international internship next year.
Another world traveller is Jillian Nichols, a third year student and one of five students selected – also being the first law student – to participate in the Ntchito Yabwino service learning experience in Malawi. The trip is organized by the International Centre for Students at the U of M campus, and the Canadian Physicians for Aid and Relief (CPAR). The goal is to give students an introduction to Africa and international development work. They will be challenged to work collaboratively and across cultures to produce narratives and images that more accurately reflect what Malawians want Canadians to know about their efforts to build healthy communities. The students will also try to assess the way other development agencies and the mass media portray development work in Africa.
Jillian has a strong interest in international humanitarian issues, with extensive volunteer experience with the Canadian Red Cross, the Humanitarian Issues Program and with International Centre for Students on campus.
“There are a lot of exciting opportunities at the U of M and in Winnipeg that I don’t think many students are aware of,” says Jillian. “Taking advantage of these opportunities and getting more involved in the larger community has greatly enriched my law school experience and I would love to encourage other students to do the same!”
We wish both Katrina and Jillian all the success in their international studies and endeavours.
Posted in: Law
July 13th, 2010
Filed under: Law
Julia Negrea, a third-year Robson Hall student working at the University Law Centre , won her first trial victory January 11th, 2010, when the Manitoba Provincial Court in Portage La Prairie handed her a precedent-setting judgment.
The case involved a charge of Obstruction of a Police Officer in the context of a child custody dispute. Julia argued that the police were not acting within the execution of their duties when they attempted to enforce a joint custody agreement, as they had no apparent legal reason to do so.
As such, the ruling in R. v. Sanderson sets a new legal precedent which will affect how clauses in child custody agreements are drafted and to what extent they can be enforced by the police.
“My research did not turn up any cases dealing with the rights of police to enforce child custody agreements, and when I reviewed the relevant legislation, it appeared to me that the police had no right, in this case, to be enforcing this particular order,” she says.
“It was very rewarding to have the judge recognize the argument and acquit my client. I hope that this ruling will clarify a gap that seemed to exist in the law.”
“(This case) will make a difference in the drafting of agreements. If either parent has a fear they may need to use the police they’ll have to put it in the order,” Negrea said. “It’s not automatic that you can use the police to get your kids back.”
“It’s a very creative argument that our student came up with,” said U of M law professor Lisa Fainstein, who specializes in family law. “As a side result she’s exposed a defect, or a hole, that people need to be aware of.”
The ruling sets a new precedent, changing how police can enforce custody orders. Well done Julia.
Posted in: Law
July 13th, 2010
Filed under: Law
Photo: Courtesy of La Liberté - Robson Hall Students Philippe Richer and Stephanie Messner
The adjective moot is originally a legal term going back to the mid-16th century and derives from the noun moot, in its sense of a hypothetical case argued as an exercise by law students. Consequently, a moot question is one that is arguable or open to debate.
But in the mid-19th century people also began to look at the hypothetical side of moot as its essential meaning, and they started to use the word to mean “of no significance or relevance.” Thus, a moot point, however debatable, is one that has no practical value.
Mooting is still very much of great practical value at Robson Hall, which continues to promote the development of strong advocacy skills among students by offering an expanded choice of mooting opportunities for course credit.
Sponsored this year by Fillmore Riley LLP, Robson Hall’s Annual Negotiation Competition takes place in September 2010.
It calls on the services of 15 volunteer lawyer judges and engages students interested in negotiation advocacy, with the winning team advancing to compete in the American Bar Association Student Division Regional Negotiation Competition.
The Canadian National Mediation Advocacy Competition was also added to our mooting program this year. Our team – Alison Cathcart and Katie Hall, profiled in this Report – placed second and competed in the International competition in Paris, France in Feb. 2010.
At the Kawaskimhon Moot, our student teams join students across Canada who use a unique combination of appellate advocacy, negotiation and consensus building skills to resolve questions regarding Aboriginal legal issues.
Trial advocacy skills are an important focus of the mooting program.
The best performing students in the second year trial advocacy program annually participate in the Western Canada Trial Moot Competition, which leads to the awarding of the McIntyre Cup. We are grateful for the support of Hill Sokalski Vincent Walsh Tripper who have graciously agreed to sponsor students participating in The Western Canadian Moot Court Competition.
The top two teams from this competition proceed to the national Sopinka Cup moot, where our 2009 team of Alison Cathcart and Davy Ireland placed second and Mr. Ireland was recognized as the competition’s best overall advocate.
The national appellate moot competitions attract students with superior oral and written advocacy skills. Selected through competitive tryouts, 12 upper year students represent Robson Hall in the Wilson Moot, focussing on constitutional equality rights. The bilingual Laskin Moot, focusses on constitutional and administrative law.
For the first time in 2009 there was also the Corporate Securities Moot.
At the Wilson Moot, Top Oralists awards went to Rafal Szymanski, ranked 3rd and Neil Steen, ranked 6th. The Robson Hall team – Shaheen Haji, Brian Monteiro, Jason Roberts and Danielle Szabo – brought home the First Place Factum prize in the Laskin Moot, capping off a very successful 2009 mooting program.
These accomplishments have raised Robson Hall’s national and international profile, thanks to the hard work of the student mooters as well as the efforts and dedication of supervising faculty and local practitioners who act as coaches and judges.
We especially thank Fillmore Riley LLP and Hill Sokalski Vincent Walsh Tripper for their generous support of these competitions. They give our students a competitive edge when they embark on a career in law.
Posted in: Law
« Previous Entries
Subscribe now!
